Friday morning docket, Pre-St. Patty’s Day edition

Top o’ the morning to ya. As you make weekend plans that may or may not involve green beer (or a green river, if you live in Chicago), here’s a look at what’s happening in Washington:

The Supreme Court justices gather today for a private conference. We’ll let you know if they had down any newsworthy orders.

Meanwhile, oral arguments resume at the Court next week, including the much anticipated arguments Tuesday in D.C. v. Heller, 07-290, where attorneys representing the District of Columbia, a D.C. resident, and the Department of Justice will make their case about whether the Second Amendment allows for a ban on handguns. If the drama in the court on Tuesday is anything like the behind-the-scenes theatre in the case, it will make for good viewing.

Other cases on the oral argument calendar next week:

On Monday, the Court will hear Philippines v. Pimentel, 06-1204, considering whether the award of assets to creditors of former Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos was proper when the Philippine government, claiming rightful ownership of the assets, excluded itself from the proceedings based on sovereign immunity. The court also will then hear arguments in Rothgery v. Gillespie County, 07-440, considering whether the right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment is implicated when a defendant was denied counsel at the time of his initial hearing for being a felon in possession of a firearm but the hearing was conducted without the involvement of a prosecutor.

Wednesday, the Court will hear arguments in Richlin Security Service v. Chertoff, 06-1717, a case considering whether, under the Equal Access to Justice Act, a prevailing party may be awarded attorney fees for paralegal services at the market rate for such services or if the Act limits reimbursement for paralegal services to cost only. Then arguments will be heard in Chamber of Commerce v. Brown, 06-939, which asks whether National Labor Relations Act, which states that companies’ anti-labor speech can only be considered unfair labor practice if it threatens or coerces workers, preempt state laws prohibiting the use of state funds to “assist, promote, or deter union organizing,” even if the public funds are transparently segregated.

Meanwhile,

Supreme Court Justices Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas tell lawmakers the federal judiciary needs cash, not cameras. (AP)

Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said women around the globe lack access to justice systems. (Lawyers USA)

Congress passes a budget. (AFP)

The White House unveils a plan to stop the credit crisis. (NYT)

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: